WePerform
Built by a cybersecurity company · We never store your code

See what AI-assisted coding is actually doing to your codebase

Quality, churn, and security signals for teams shipping with Copilot, Claude, and Cursor — without surveilling your developers.

No card required · GitHub & GitLab · 5-minute install

pull request #482refactor: tighten session validation
WePerform
Quality A · no new security findings · churn risk: low

One quiet line on every PR. No comment spam, no blocked merges.

The problem

AI assistants broke every metric you used to trust

Commit counts, lines of code, and PR volume are inflated by generated code — while churn (code rewritten weeks after merging) is rising sharply. Volume says productivity is up. Reality is more complicated.

Trust layer

Churn-adjusted quality

Code that survives 30 days counts. Code rewritten in 3 weeks counts against. Plus complexity deltas, PR cycle time, review participation, and an AI-code-share estimate your board keeps asking about.

Security layer

Signals nobody else has

Semgrep findings introduced vs. resolved, risky dependencies with known CVEs, committed-secret detection — per team and per trend. Built by an identity-verification & cybersecurity company.

Quality layer

LLM reviews with rationale

Significant PRs scored against a published rubric — readability, test discipline, security craft, scope, interface usability — with a written rationale a developer actually reads in their 1:1.

Developer-owned, not surveillance

Analytics your developers won't revolt against

  • Developers see all of their own data — every score, every rationale, same numbers as their manager.
  • Managers see trends, not leaderboards — team aggregates plus per-person direction (improving / stable / declining) over rolling 90-day windows.
  • The rubric is published — if it isn't written down, it isn't scored. Disputed scores get human review.
  • Never measured: lines of code, commit counts, hours, or time-of-day patterns.
Your code never leaves the pipeline

Diffs are fetched transiently, analyzed in memory, and discarded. We persist metrics, scores, and written rationales — never source code. It's not a policy promise; it's how the system is built.

Read the security architecture →
Why WePerform

One tool instead of two

Engineering analytics platforms track trends but ignore security. AI review bots comment on PRs but forget everything by Friday. WePerform does longitudinal quality and security signal on every PR — self-serve, from $12 per developer.