How WePerform compares
Engineering analytics platforms track trends but skip security. AI review bots comment on PRs but keep no history. WePerform does both jobs in one subscription. Public list prices as of July 2026 — check vendors for current figures.
| WePerform | Swarmia | GitClear | CodeRabbit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid price / dev / month | $12 | ≈ €20 (Lite) | $14.95 (annual) | $24 (annual) |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes |
| Churn / code-survival metrics | Yes — 30-day survival | Limited | Yes (diff delta) | No |
| AI-code-share reporting | Yes | No | Partial | No |
| Security signals (SAST, deps, secrets) | Yes — core feature | No | No | Partial (review comments) |
| Credits fixing security findings | Yes | No | No | No |
| Per-PR feedback | One quiet status line | No | No | Full review comments |
| Longitudinal trends (3 years) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Individual assessment w/ published rubric | Yes — dev-owned | No (team-only by design) | Partial | No |
| Stores your source code | Never — architectural | Vendor-dependent | Vendor-dependent | Vendor-dependent |
| GitLab support | Yes (incl. self-managed) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Swarmia is excellent for team health and deliberately hides individual data. Choose WePerform if you want individual assessment done *transparently* — dev-owned data, published rubric — plus security signals Swarmia doesn't have, at roughly half the price.
GitClear pioneered diff-quality metrics and publishes great AI-code research. WePerform adds the security layer (Semgrep, dependency CVEs, secrets), LLM reviews with written rationale, and the never-store-your-code guarantee.
CodeRabbit reviews each PR in depth with comments — and forgets it by the next one. WePerform is the longitudinal memory: trends, survival rates, and security posture over years, with a quiet check instead of comment threads. Many teams run both.
Sources: public vendor pricing pages, July 2026. See also our pricing and security architecture.